...that is the question!
Here is the article about Dr. Atlas' opinion that I mentioned in my video:
https://dailycaller.com/2020/04/27/stanford-scott-atlas-coronavirus-herd-immunity/
And here is the opposite side of the debate:
https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/coronavirus-herd-immunity-eugenics-market-200414104531234.html
I am leaning towards not relying on herd immunity and instead continue social distancing and rigorous hygiene, testing and contact tracing. Especially after reading this in the article on Al-Jazeera:
"So why would a public health policy be acceptable simply because, as far as we know, the virus kills primarily old people and people with underlying conditions? What does this say about a society that accepts that the elderly and the sick can die in numbers, as an alternative to widespread economic damage caused by more stringent suppression measures?"
So much to ingest. My head is full. Time for rest. Talk to you tomorrow!
Love, peace and blessings. Sleep well, my friends.
Zita
Here is the article about Dr. Atlas' opinion that I mentioned in my video:
https://dailycaller.com/2020/04/27/stanford-scott-atlas-coronavirus-herd-immunity/
And here is the opposite side of the debate:
https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/coronavirus-herd-immunity-eugenics-market-200414104531234.html
I am leaning towards not relying on herd immunity and instead continue social distancing and rigorous hygiene, testing and contact tracing. Especially after reading this in the article on Al-Jazeera:
"So why would a public health policy be acceptable simply because, as far as we know, the virus kills primarily old people and people with underlying conditions? What does this say about a society that accepts that the elderly and the sick can die in numbers, as an alternative to widespread economic damage caused by more stringent suppression measures?"
So much to ingest. My head is full. Time for rest. Talk to you tomorrow!
Love, peace and blessings. Sleep well, my friends.
Zita
Comments
Post a Comment